Category: Uncategorized

Categories
Uncategorized

CDF Announces the (Trans)cend College Grant

The Cloud Dancers Foundation is happy to announce the first (Trans)cend College Grant. 


(TRANS)CEND COLLEGE GRANT
SEPTEMBER 1ST, 2023 – SEPTEMBER 30TH, 2023

As an organization, we are dedicated to promoting the safety and security of transgender and nonbinary people across the United States. Our mission has always been rooted in both the visibility and awareness of transgender people; and now, during a time when the rights and safety of transgender people has been continuously threatened and when transgender violence is at a statistical peak, we want to provide economic assistance to transgender students who may be unable to find that support elsewhere in their communities.

Who can apply? If you are above the age of 18, are currently attending college, and actively identify as nonbinary/transgender, you are encouraged to apply! There is no maximum age limit for applicants. Our main focus is providing for students who may not be able to receive this support otherwise, so we will ask about First-Generation/Low-Income (FGLI) student status and if you are taking out a student loan, however please feel encouraged to apply even if you are not FGLI!

What is the grant amount? We will be distributing gift cards of up to $500, USD, to be used at your discretion!

What will the application request? Our application consists of three main questions, all of which have a maximum word limit of 300:

  1. What is your “story”? 
  2. Why are you applying for this grant? What would you use the money for?
  3. Please feel free to share any information you feel would be relevant to us.

Aside from these questions, we will also ask for your basic information such as your email, name, pronouns, age, hometown, and college. Note that you will have control over how much of this information will be released, as we understand that not everyone is “out” or able to have their identity published online.

What will be shared online? Once winners are selected, we may contact those chosen to request the opportunity to share their story online. This will be completely optional, and is not at all required to receive the grant.

What is the application period? The application will open September 1st, 2023, and close on September 30th, 2023.

We are hopeful that we will be able to host this grant again in the future, which will not be possible without your applications! If you have any questions, require assistance or accommodations in your application process, please reach out to info@clouddancers.org for more information and assistance.

Again, you can apply here!

Categories
Uncategorized

An Explanation of TERF Ideology

By Jeremiah Ancheta

Introduction

The term TERF, or Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist, has become more known in recent years as the fight for (and unfortunately, the fight against) trans rights continues. But what exactly is the deal with TERFs and what relevance do they have with trans people?

This post will give an explanation of TERF ideology and why it is harmful towards transgender people.

Feminism and Radical Feminism

First, what is feminism? I like the simple definition given by bell hooks that encompasses various strands of feminism throughout history – “Feminism is a movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation, and oppression.” Radical feminism can be described as a strand of feminism which seeks to eliminate the patriarchy with a re-ordering and re-structuration of society. 

Feminists and radical feminists point out the existence of the patriarchy, which can be roughly described as a social system in place that advantages men and disadvantages women in various social aspects of their lives. Such social aspects include one’s social standing, access to material resources, how they are affected in the political sphere, etc. The advantages that men have in society in virtue of being men is what makes them privileged, in contrast with women who are oppressed due to the disadvantages they have in virtue of being women.

Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminism

Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminism, or TERF, can be described as believing in these two points:

  1. Following feminism in seeking to end oppression towards women
  2. Gender is identical to sex and is thus a biological phenomenon

As explained in a previous post by Cloud Dancers, those who believe that gender is a biological phenomenon believe that whether a person is a man/woman is based on biological features, typically one’s sex chromosome make-up and their sex organs. For such people, what it is to be a woman is to be a person with XX sex chromosomes and a vagina. This is also how one’s gender is assigned at birth.

Those who believe that gender is a strictly biological phenomenon typically deny the existence and identity of transgender people – people whose gender does not align with one’s sex assigned at birth. 

So for TERFs, trans-women do not count as women. As such, they are excluded from being considered oppressed as women in following their project of feminism. 

Furthermore, it is seemingly the case that those associated with the term TERF also vehemently criticize trans activism. For instance, J.K. Rowling and Dave Chappelle are two such notable individuals and have criticized trans activism and trans people within their fields of work. For more on this, see Cloud Dancer’s posts on Rowling and Chappelle. 

As seen through the actions and reception towards Rowling and Chappelle, those associated with TERFs see much support due to their public endorsement of feminist ideals, yet their ideology continues to hurt trans people by denying their existence and identity or painting their activism in a negative light.

Categories
Uncategorized

Missouri’s Restrictions on Gender-Affirming Care

By Jeremiah Ancheta

On April 13, 2023, an emergency rule from Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey was introduced that restricts gender-affirming care for transgender people in the state. According to an article by AP News, the ruling “will impose numerous restrictions on both adults and children before they can receive puberty blocking drugs, hormones or surgeries ‘for the purpose of transitioning gender.’” It goes into effect on April 27 and expires in February 2024.

Such restrictions include:

  • Transgender patients must have undergone at least 15 hour-long sessions in therapy over a course of at least 18 months prior to seeking gender-affirming care
  • Patients must be screened for autism and “social-media addiction,” 
  • Patients with psychiatric symptoms due to mental health issues, such as depression and anxiety, must first be treated and resolved

As we can see, Missouri has made it nearly impossible for transgender people to attain gender-affirming care. As noted in previous posts from Cloud Dancers, transgender people often go through various mental health struggles due to the discrimination and stigma they face. 

In fact, according to the Columbia University Department of Psychiatry, “research demonstrates that gender-affirming care… greatly improves the mental health and overall well-being of gender diverse, transgender, and non-binary children and adolescents.” Furthermore, a 2021 study in the Journal of Adolescent Health involving 11,000 gender-diverse youth found that access to such care reduced depression and suicidality.

Additionally, the ruling is harmful in an intersectional manner as it denies access to gender-affirming care to autistic transgender people. In other words, the ruling is harmful towards transgender people, autistic people, and autistic transgender people.

Unfortunately, Missouri isn’t the only state to see bans on gender-affirming care. Other states such as Alabama and Florida have had similar rulings implemented.

Not too long ago, “[Texas] Gov. Greg Abbott told state health agencies… that medical treatments provided to transgender adolescents, widely considered to be the standard of care in medicine, should be classified as ‘child abuse’ under existing state law” according to a 2022 article by the New York Times.

Many organizations are already looking to challenge this ruling. For instance, the ACLU and Lambda Legal said in a joint statement that they would “take any necessary legal action” and urged those affected to call, according to another article by AP News.

Categories
Uncategorized

Transgender Hate and the Bud Light Boycott

Image sourced from https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-pop-culture/bud-light-partnership-trans-influencer-dylan-mulvaney-prompts-rightwin-rcna78295

2023 has already been a year of boycotts, with conservatives latching onto brands like M&Ms in a culture-war against “wokeness” — that is, the idea that these brands are serving to make everyone in the nation queer, trans, or a racial minority; that they are no longer the homegrown, American businesses dedicated to the ‘normal’ (that is, the white male, as ‘normal’ is more often than not a dog whistle for misogynistic, racist ideas), but are now spreading a new liberal agenda of making everyone different. This has most recently become the problem of Bud Light, the highest selling beer in the United States, following a partnership with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney.

In the past, we’ve discussed the importance of allyship amongst elites — including corporations like Anheuser-Busch InBev — and the importance of transgender safety in the workplace, our most recent article. The Bud Light Boycott is relevant: with a higher rate of bomb threats, employees being harassed over social media and threatened with violence, and the company having to cancel events due to harassment, it is evidently clear that this transphobia goes beyond just words.

In reality, the “boycott” has done very little to affect the actual sales of Bud Light. As was the case with M&Ms, Coca-Cola, and other companies who have faced similar conservative “boycotts” in the past, the reality is that these companies are incredibly secure in what they are. Anheuser-Busch InBev has had their stocks go up rather than down over the past month, with only a few minimum drops from new highs in the past few days (although it has begun to climb again as of April 12th), and the company itself is worth billions of dollars. Even with all of the videos of people dumping Bud Light cans, shooting them, or buying Coors instead (even though Coors has also supported Pride), the company itself is smooth sailing. Why would they care what happens to their cans after they’ve already been bought? Besides, Anheuser-Busch InBev, which has a concentration hold on beer production, produces a large number of Bud Light’s “replacement” beers anyhow.

The issue, of course, is not the company itself. The issue is the existence — and recognition — of transgender people: that is what these boycotters are so angry about.

Mulvaney has borne the brunt of the attack against Bud Light. John Cardillo, a conservative commentator, openly misgendered Mulvaney in a tweet against the brand. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted that the brand had changed its gender to the “Queen of Beers,” a direct dig against Mulvaney’s transition. Several other conservative spokespeople and commentators have done the same. Mulvaney herself has faced harassment and threats of violence for years, but this has intensified since the brand deal. Still, both Mulvaney and the company have rightfully stood by their decision.

Misinformation about the campaign has also gone rampant. Rumors about Anheuser-Busch InBev firing their entire marketing department over the decision to partner with Mulvaney, for example, was proven false by the Associated Press.

These boycotts hurt people more than companies. Harassment, violence, and abuse all become normalized when bomb threats against the company have gone nationwide, influencers comments become filled with death threats, and politicians begin to attack rather than support. In our last article, we ended with the following:

The time to act is now. According to the Human Rights Campaign, in 2020 and 2021, transgender people faced a record amount of violence.

Citation per the Human Rights Campaign
Categories
Uncategorized

Being Transgender at Work and the Lack of Safety

Sign our petition to demand safety for transgender employees.

The biggest issue for transgender people in the workplace is safety, as revealed by a recent McKinsey study.1 This is a pressing issue that goes beyond pay inequality and lack of career advancement, both of which transgender people also face. Although President Biden passed an executive order to stop discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation, the law has not translated into change in the workplace.2

In 2020, Harvard Business Review said organizations tend to focus on sexual orientation and not gender identity.  There is a greater focus on the LGB than the TQ+.3 To put this in perspective, Gallup found that in the U.S., for Gen Z, 2.5% identifies as gay, 2.0% identifies as lesbian, and 2.1% identifies as transgender.4 A significant portion of the future and current transgender workforce will face safety-related issues at work if we do not act now.

A 2021 study by the Williams Institute at UCLA found 44% of transgender workers faced verbal harassment, and 22% faced sexual harassment.5 There are other safety issues faced by transgender employees as well. McKinsey found 50% of transgender applicants felt they could not reveal their full selves during the interview process and safety was the number one reason for avoiding certain industries. While on the job, things are not much better, the survey found.  Only 32% felt they could be fully out at work.1 There are significant barriers to advancement as well for the transgender workforce.

It is imperative that transgender employees feel safe and allowed to fully be themselves.  There are a few key areas that need to be addressed to help the transgender workforce:  1) Use a common and inclusive vocabulary at work, 2) Be intentional in the recruiting process, 3) Leaders must proactively create an environment of acceptance, 4) Provide the proper healthcare that is needed.  

The time to act is now.  According to the Human Rights Campaign, in 2020 and 2021, transgender people faced a record amount of violence.6

Sources:

  1. Baboolall, David, Greenberg, Sarah, and Obeid, Maurice (2021). Being Transgender at Work, McKinsey & Company.
  2. The White House Briefing Room (2021). Executive Order on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation.
  3. Sawyer, Katina et al. (2020). Creating a Trans-Inclusive Workplace, Harvard Business Review.
  4. Jones, Jeffrey (2022). LGBT Identification in U.S. Ticks Up to 7.1%, Gallup.
  5. Williams Institute at UCLA, 2021. LGBT People’s Experiences of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment.
  6. Human Rights Campaign Foundation (2021). Fatal Violence Against the Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming Community in 2021.
Categories
Uncategorized

The Importance of Data Collection

By Jeremiah Ancheta

The Current State of the Data on the Trans Community

According to the National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE), “Transgender people, and the issues they face, are under-studied because surveys of the general population rarely ask whether a respondent is transgender.” Furthermore, “Without including questions to determine whether a person is transgender on general population surveys, we lack official information about unemployment rates, income and poverty, drug and alcohol abuse, suicide, and all other data that are regularly measured in the general population.”

This point is echoed by the U.S. Foundation Funding for Trans Communities, stating that “Many federal programs and major surveys do not collect data on gender identity. This lack of data has made it difficult to identify and fully understand the unique needs of transgender communities.”

The Importance of Data Collection

As noted above, the lack of data on transgender people has made it difficult to accurately identify and understand the depth of the issues they face. As such, it is clear that the more data we have on trans people, the better we are able to understand their plights and act accordingly to deal with those issues.

For instance, let’s consider the importance of data collection in other social spheres. This article by the NCBI notes that “Racial and ethnic disparities in health have been extensively documented… Making progress toward the goal of eliminating disparities will require widespread, reliable, and consistent data about the racial and ethnic characteristics of the U.S. population.”

Insofar as there are health disparities between the trans community and the general population (and there definitely are), then eliminating these disparities will also require collecting reliable and consistent data on trans people.

The health sphere is only one kind of the many disparities between transgender people and the general population. Other disparities include suicide risk and ideation, being victims of violent crimes, and being at greater risk of unemployment and poverty.

Next Steps

First, we encourage transgender people to participate in the NCTE’s United States Transgender Survey (USTS). The 2015 USTS has been to date the largest national survey that has collected information on transgender people, covering their experiences and the issues they face. The next one started in October 2022. The more transgender people that participate in the survey, the more accurate data we will have on the community.

Second, we call for more investigations and research into transgender people and the issues they face. As noted above, transgender people and the issues they face are under-studied. 

Categories
Uncategorized

Allyship Amongst Elites

Image sourced from ELLE

In January of this year, Taylor Swift released the music video for her chart-topping song Lavender Haze, which included transgender model Laith Ashley playing Swift’s love interest through the ‘hazy,’ cloudy, purple realm of the video. If you didn’t know Ashley to begin with, you likely would have never noticed; and yet the decision to include a transgender model — even if not the focal point of the video — is still a powerful political and social decision.

In one of our previous articles, I briefly broke down how transgender lives easily become a market scheme for elites to build platforms. These stories, more often than not, are focused on the suffering of transgender people: the exclusion one might face, the familial and platonic distancing, the unemployment, et cetera. But that is not the focus of Ashley’s inclusion in the Lavender Haze music video, and nor is in the point of various pieces of media where transgender people are represented and included but not made out to be the epitome of suffering. Transgender people can be who they are: they can have girlfriends, and go to parties, and do not have to exist in expulsion.

Transgender people can be who they are: they can have girlfriends, and go to parties, and do not have to exist in expulsion.

In the Lavender Haze music video, released in January, model Laith Ashley played the romantic lead opposed to Taylor Swift.

Swift is not the only artist who has been so directly involved in transgender inclusion and the fight for LGBTQ rights, but she is also one of the most prevalent in today’s view — Swift, who has maintained one of the top artists of 2023 and dominated the Top Music Billboard in the end of 2022, has a “fandom” (that is, a group of fans) of people who are openly queer, one of which she is an active ally for.

Other artists who do the same? The list is long and includes other notable figures like Beyonce, for example, who has proven herself to be a queer and trans ally time and time again. Certainly the list of artists who claim to be allies is even longer. Notable change, however, comes from movement — it comes from representation and action; action by these notable elites who can, and should, fight for true change above all else. And an example of that? Bad Bunny.

Like Swift, Bad Bunny maintained his legacy as an artist with the most-streamed album of 2022, Un Verano Sin Ti, but has for even longer been an ally to the transgender community. In 2020, Bad Bunny paid tribute to Alexa Negrón Luciano, a transgender woman who was murdered in Puerto Rico, when he wore to his performance on The Tonight Show a black skirt and a t-shirt stating: Mataron a Alexa, no a un hombre con falda.

They killed Alexa, not a man in a skirt.

Image taken from Billboard

It takes open, honest allyship — openness to hiring transgender actors and models, openness to advocate, openness to fight — to make real change against all odds. We, as individuals, only hold so much power over the media, politics, and policing, but the artists, musicians, actors, and elites that we look up to can do so much more; and should.

Categories
Uncategorized

Sex and Gender

By Jeremiah Ancheta

Sex and Gender as Identical

Many people believe that ‘gender’ is simply another word for ‘sex.’ As such, to say that one is male is identical to saying that one is a man, and to say that one is female is identical to saying that one is a woman.

Additionally, it is believed that whether a person is a woman/man (and thus whether that person is female/male) is based on biological features. The main features that are said to determine whether one is a man/woman are typically one’s chromosomes and sex organs. Women are people with XX sex chromosomes and have vaginas; men are people with XY sex chromosomes and have penises.

These coupled beliefs are typically held by those who deny the existence and identity of transgender people. For instance, Maya Forstater, a researcher who worked for the Center for Global Development, has previously tweeted “… male people are not women. I dont think being a woman/female is a matter of identity or womanly feelings. It is biology.” For more on Forstater and her involvement in J.K. Rowling’s transphobia, see Cloud Dancer’s previous post on the matter.

Sex and Gender as Distinct

In contrast to the idea that gender is simply synonymous with sex, or that one’s gender is identical to one’s sex, many feminists believe that sex and gender are distinct. From the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article ‘Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender,’ the distinction is characterized as follows:

Provisionally: ‘sex’ denotes human females and males depending on biological features (chromosomes, sex organs, hormones and other physical features); ‘gender’ denotes women and men depending on social factors (social role, position, behaviour or identity). 

The idea is that ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ refer to two different phenomena – the former referring to a biological phenomenon and the latter to a latter phenomenon. Since they refer to different phenomena, then it does not make sense to say that they are identical. 

Unlike the idea that sex and gender are identical, this distinction between sex and gender is able to explain and account for the existence and identity of transgender and non-binary people – those whose gender identity does not align with the sex they were assigned at birth. 

What exactly does it mean to say that one’s gender identity does not “align” with one’s sex assigned at birth? It’s helpful to understand this idea by first understanding what makes someone cisgender – when one’s gender identity does align with their sex at birth.

Typically, cisgender people are characterized as one of these two:

  • People who identify as a woman and were assigned female from birth (Cis women)
  • People who identify as a man and were assigned male from birth (Cis men)

People who do not find themselves under one of these two relationships are said to be transgender or non-binary.

  • People who identify as a woman and were assigned male from birth (Transwomen)
  • People who identify as a man and were assigned female from birth (Transmen)
  • People who neither identify as a a man or a woman despite their assigned sex from birth (Non-binary people)
Categories
Uncategorized

Explaining J.K. Rowling’s Transphobia

By Jeremiah Ancheta

J.K. Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter series, has made several transphobic remarks in the last couple of years. Despite the criticism she has received from trans people and activists, Rowling continues to make such comments and doubles down on them in the face of trans people. Unfortunately, it seems that most in the public sphere are in support of Rowling, characterizing the attacks towards her as unjustified and simply due to “cancel culture.”

The public debate has re-emerged in popularity with the recent release of the popular video game Hogwarts Legacy which is based on Rowling’s Harry Potter novels.

This post will give a comprehensive explanation of why J.K Rowling is transphobic. 

Rowling’s Support for Maya Forstater

In 2019, Maya Forstater, a researcher who worked for the Center for Global Development, “lost her job at a thinktank after tweeting that transgender women cannot change their biological sex” according to a piece by The Guardian.

Forstater has a history of transphobic comments on Twitter. She has previously tweeted “… male people are not women. I dont think being a woman/female is a matter of identity or womanly feelings. It is biology.” Additionally, she has misgendered Pips Bunce, a non-binary and gender fluid person who was listed on the Top 100 Female Executives in 2018 by HERoes, having tweeted “he is a man who likes to express himself part of the week by wearing a dress.”

In response to Forstater’s losing her job, Rowling sent out a tweet in December 2019 that said: 

Dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like. Sleep with any consenting adult who’ll have you. Live your best life in peace and security. But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real? 

#IStandWithMaya #ThisIsNotADrill

Obviously, Forstater said more than “sex is real.” She has denied the existence and identity of trans people. By standing with Maya Forstater, it is clear that Rowling is defending Forstater’s transphobic comments and is in agreement with them. 

Rowling’s Problematic Conception of a Woman

A June 2020 tweet by Rowling revealed her conception of a woman – a person who menstruates. While this has the strange entailment of excluding some cis-women from being considered women due to a hysterectomy or menopause (people that I’m sure Rowling herself would consider as being women), it also excludes trans-women from being considered women and counts trans-men who menstruate as being women.

Rowling’s Transphobic Essay

In response to the criticism that she has received, Rowling published an essay on her website discussing her views on trans issues and problems she has with trans activism. Despite Rowling’s attempt to justify her comments and stances on trans issues, Rowling only revealed more of her transphobia.

Magdalen Berns

Rowling talks about the criticism she received after following Magdalen Berns, who unfortunately passed away years ago from an aggressive brain tumor.

Months later, I compounded my accidental ‘like’ crime by following Magdalen Berns on Twitter. Magdalen was an immensely brave young feminist and lesbian who was dying of an aggressive brain tumour. I followed her because I wanted to contact her directly, which I succeeded in doing. However, as Magdalen was a great believer in the importance of biological sex, and didn’t believe lesbians should be called bigots for not dating trans women with penises, dots were joined in the heads of twitter trans activists, and the level of social media abuse increased.

Here, Rowling seems to characterize the criticism she has received as unjustified  by painting Berns as an unproblematic individual fighting for feminism. Just as she did with Forstater, Rowling characterizes Berns as merely making claims about biological sex. However, what Rowling failed to mention was the more blatant transphobic remarks made by Berns, which is the actual reason why such criticism was made in the first place by trans people and activists. 

For instance, Berns has denied trans women their identity and existence, saying that “trans women are male” in a YouTube video of hers. Furthermore, she has previously likened trans women to “blackface actors,” calling them men who pretend to be women for perverted reasons. This was reported by The Guardian and an image of the original tweet can be found here. 

Rowling’s Vilification of Trans Activism

In the second half of her essay, Rowling gives her reasons for being worried about trans activism. 

First, she says that:

It’s been clear to me for a while that the new trans activism is… pushing to erode the legal definition of sex and replace it with gender.

This definitely isn’t happening and it’s hard to believe Rowling when she doesn’t give examples of any organized activist efforts to replace the legal definition of sex with gender.

Second, she says:

I’m an ex-teacher and the founder of a children’s charity, which gives me an interest in both education and safeguarding. Like many others, I have deep concerns about the effect the trans rights movement is having on both.

Again, Rowling doesn’t give any substantial examples of the effects that trans activism has on education and safeguarding.

In her third reason, she simply says:

As a much-banned author, I’m interested in freedom of speech and have publicly defended it, even unto Donald Trump.

Rowling seems to be saying that trans activism is a threat to freedom of speech, perhaps due to the criticism she has received for her remarks. As Rowling doesn’t give an explanation of how trans activism threatens freedom of speech, there isn’t much to respond to.

Given all this, we see that Rowling is vilifying the trans movement, stating that it is a threat to the legal definition of sex, education and safeguarding, freedom of speech. Despite these concerns, Rowling doesn’t give any evidence or explanation of how the trans movement threatens all these things.

Perpetuating Predator Myths

In December 2021, Scottish police stated that they will “record rapes as being committed by a woman if a male attacker simply identifies as a female” according to a piece by The Scottish Sun. Rowling responded to this by tweeting:

War is Peace. 

Freedom is Slavery. 

Ignorance is Strength. 

The Penised Individual Who Raped You Is a Woman.

To be clear, the first three lines come from George Orwell’s 1984 and are meant to convey contradictions present in the fictional world of the book. By saying “the penised individual who raped you is a woman,” Rowling conveys that this message is a contradiction and that in fact a person who identifies as a woman and has a penis is a man. 

Not only is Rowling, again, denying the identity of trans people; she is perpetuating the myth that trans people, particularly women with male genitalia, are sexual predators and only identify as women in order to find opportunities to commit sexual assault towards other women. Proponents of this claim typically believe that such sexual assaults would occur if we allow trans people to use public restrooms that correspond with their gender.

Despite this popular myth, there is absolutely no evidence to back it up. In fact, a 2019 study in the Sexuality Research and Social Policy journal found that the enactment of laws permitting trans people to use public restrooms that correspond with their gender “is not related to the number of frequency or criminal incidents in these spaces. Additionally, the study finds that reports of privacy and safety violations in public restrooms, locker rooms, and changing rooms are exceedingly rare.”

Final Words

As we have seen, Rowling has made various transphobic remarks the last couple of years – showing support for other transphobes, vilifying trans activism, and perpetuating trans predator myths. 

Much of her justification of her stances involve obfuscation or lack of context that make it seem like the criticism towards her as unjustified, For instance, she characterizes Maya Forstater and Magdalen Berns is simply being believers in biological sex, leaving out the fact that they have made blatant transphobic remarks. In failing to mention these latter facts, people learning about the controversy through her own words do not get the whole picture. Rather, they get an embellished one that paints Rowling as a “victim” of trans activism.

Categories
Uncategorized

Writing Trans Characters

Hunter Schaefer, the actress who plays Jules in the hit TV show Euphoria

As a writer myself, I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about the identities of my characters. What makes an identity? What defines their life story, who they are, and how they got there? It seems like a pretty simple question: you sit down and you make up this life, this person, and then you figure out the rest later, but really that’s not so — especially when it comes to trans characters.

There’s an issue plaguing modern fiction. There’s an issue plaguing television, film, and video games. This issue?

The commercialization of trans lives.

It’s not a small topic. It’s something that expands beyond our means, and beyond what I can write about in a short article — it’s the fantasy of having a trans person in the background of your story, a best friend who has an arching storyline of “Nobody sees me for who I am! Nobody supports me!” (see Max Sweeney in The L Word), or of “I don’t fit in! I must be trans!” (see Sheldon in Glee). Of course, there are success stories too, especially in more recent media: Jules in Euphoria was one of the first younger trans characters played by a trans actor who rose in popularity through the story, and the many characters in POSE represent an important part of transgender history that is often overlooked. 

The cast of POSE, the majority of whom are transgender women; sourced from https://www.emmys.com/news/features/license-thrill

But there’s a common thread there, too; the majority of the time, this is queer media marketed to queer audiences. Euphoria, for example, despite its boom in popularity, was widely accepted by and marketed towards the younger generation of queer people who could see themselves in the relationships between Jules and Rue, or trans people who could find solace in the acceptance and struggles Jules has throughout the series.

So few of these success stories of trans characters involve these characters as not a sob story sub-plot-line, but as a person, a human being who is not something new or unheard of, but is who they are without need for explanation. Still, even the poor representation of trans people in the media has led to rising rates of transgender acceptance and understanding. Is this the price to pay for any representation at all? I believe that’s not the case: as years go on, more and more trans people are shown in all forms of commercialization, from books to advertisements, and with that comes a rising amount of proper representation.

We, as viewers, have to hold creators accountable and have to point out the flaws when they are present as well as supporting the successes when they are publicized. According to GLAAD, 20% of Americans reported knowing someone who was trans, and that’s only by reports of people who are aware of the trans identities of their co-workers, friends, and family; in reality, that number continues to grow and is likely much higher from our day-to-day interactions with people who aren’t as open about their identities, but still exist.